The
composition of the work also amplifies the still life's
symbolic meaning. In our illustration you can see how
Harmen Steenwyck has used the diagonals of the painting
to construct its arrangement. The objects which represent
the 'Vanities of Human Life' fill the lower half of
the work which is split by a diagonal. The absence of
form in the upper half represents our spiritual existence.
This is an empty space into which we can project our
beliefs and ideas as to what this means. In this space
a beam of light, which descends on the opposite diagonal,
establishes the dramatic tone of the work and symbolically
suggests the link between this life and the next. This
beam also has two practical functions within the composition:
it illuminates the skull and acts as a counterbalance
to the triangular arrangement of objects in the lower
section.
The
Painting Technique

Steenwyck
employs a very impressive painting technique to give
the still life a vivid sense of realism. Using small
brushes, he paints the image on an oak panel which is
primed and sanded to form a glass smooth ground. By
building up the picture with thin glazes of oil paint
he manages to realistically convey the wide range of
textures that the individual objects possess: the iridescence
of the shell, the translucence of bone, the softness
of leather, the smoothness of silk, the reflections
of metal, the coldness of stoneware, the roughness of
rope and a variety of wood surfaces that range from
a gloss varnish to a dull matt.
The
assorted forms and textures of the objects are unified
by the limited palette of tertiary
colours that Steenwyck selects. These subdued colours
are chosen because the overall arrangement of objects
is too complex and their textures are too refined to
support a bolder colour composition. To counteract this
subtlety he adds a sense of drama by highlighting each
object with exaggerated tone.
The
Development of Dutch Still Life

Harmen
Steenwyck - Still
Life with Fruit and Dead Fowl
(oil on canvas, 1630)
Private Collection
In
seventeenth century Holland, still life grew in popularity
as a subject due to the Reformation. In the previous
centuries artists had found patronage in the creation
of religious imagery for the Catholic Church, but as
this support declined, they had to adapt to survive
in the new Protestant climate. Still lifes using symbolic
images that reflected Protestant attitudes found favour
and patronage from the Dutch merchant classes. The character
of different towns is even reflected in their choice
of symbolic objects. The university town of Leiden,
where Harmen Steenwyck studied art under his uncle David
Bailly, preferred skulls and books, whereas the Hague,
a market centre, favoured fish with its traditional
Christian associations, while many others used flowers,
another Dutch product.
The
Vanitas Influence

David
Bailly (1584-1657)
Self-Portrait with Vanitas Symbols (oil on wood panel,
1651)
Stedelijk
Museum De Lakenhal, Leiden
David
Bailly was Harmen Steenwyck's uncle and teacher. You
can see his influence through the choice of subject
matter in his painting below. This is a self portrait
of Bailly with a full range of 'Vanitas' objects. The
painting depicts Bailly as a young man holding a contemporary
self portrait - he was in his sixties when he painted
the work. This gesture fuses together portraiture and
still life into the one 'Vanitas' concept.
The
Vanitas Flaw

Harmen
Steenwyck - Vanitas
(oil on wood panel, 1640)
Stedelijk
Museum De Lakenhal, Leiden
Vanitas
paintings were popular in countries with strict Protestant
and Catholic Christian principles such as Holland and
Spain. They were purchased by the rich who possessed
a conscience about the wealth they had accumulated.
However the genre had an inbuilt weakness in the irony
that the paintings were also valuable and collectible
commodities and, as such, became 'Vanitas' objects themselves.
Harmen
Steenwyck Notes

Harmen
Steenwyck - Still Life (oil on canvas)
Private Collection