The
composition of the work also amplifies the still life's
symbolic meaning. In our illustration you can see how Harmen
Steenwyck has used the diagonals of the painting to construct
its arrangement. The objects which represent the 'Vanities
of Human Life' fill the lower half of the work which is
split by a diagonal. The absence of form in the upper half
represents our spiritual existence. This is an empty space
into which we can project our beliefs and ideas as to what
this means. In this space a beam of light, which descends
on the opposite diagonal, establishes the dramatic tone
of the work and symbolically suggests the link between this
life and the next. This beam also has two practical functions
within the composition: it illuminates the skull and acts
as a counterbalance to the triangular arrangement of objects
in the lower section.
The
Painting Technique

Steenwyck
employs a very impressive painting technique to give the
still life a vivid sense of realism. Using small brushes,
he paints the image on an oak panel which is primed and
sanded to form a glass smooth ground. By building up the
picture with thin glazes of oil paint he manages to realistically
convey the wide range of textures that the individual objects
possess: the iridescence of the shell, the translucence
of bone, the softness of leather, the smoothness of silk,
the reflections of metal, the coldness of stoneware, the
roughness of rope and a variety of wood surfaces that range
from a gloss varnish to a dull matt.
The
assorted forms and textures of the objects are unified by
the limited palette of tertiary
colours that Steenwyck selects. These subdued colours
are chosen because the overall arrangement of objects is
too complex and their textures are too refined to support
a bolder colour composition. To counteract this subtlety
he adds a sense of drama by highlighting each object with
exaggerated tone.
The
Development of Dutch Still Life

Harmen
Steenwyck - Still
Life with Fruit and Dead Fowl
(oil on canvas, 1630)
Private Collection
In
seventeenth century Holland, still life grew in popularity
as a subject due to the Reformation. In the previous centuries
artists had found patronage in the creation of religious
imagery for the Catholic Church, but as this support declined,
they had to adapt to survive in the new Protestant climate.
Still lifes using symbolic images that reflected Protestant
attitudes found favour and patronage from the Dutch merchant
classes. The character of different towns is even reflected
in their choice of symbolic objects. The university town
of Leiden, where Harmen Steenwyck studied art under his
uncle David Bailly, preferred skulls and books, whereas
the Hague, a market centre, favoured fish with its traditional
Christian associations, while many others used flowers,
another Dutch product.
The
Vanitas Influence

David
Bailly (1584-1657)
Self-Portrait with Vanitas Symbols (oil on wood panel, 1651)
Stedelijk
Museum De Lakenhal, Leiden
David
Bailly was Harmen Steenwyck's uncle and teacher. You can
see his influence through the choice of subject matter in
his painting below. This is a self portrait of Bailly with
a full range of 'Vanitas' objects. The painting depicts
Bailly as a young man holding a contemporary self portrait
- he was in his sixties when he painted the work. This gesture
fuses together portraiture and still life into the one 'Vanitas'
concept.
The
Vanitas Flaw

Harmen
Steenwyck - Vanitas
(oil on wood panel, 1640)
Stedelijk
Museum De Lakenhal, Leiden
Vanitas
paintings were popular in countries with strict Protestant
and Catholic Christian principles such as Holland and Spain.
They were purchased by the rich who possessed a conscience
about the wealth they had accumulated. However the genre
had an inbuilt weakness in the irony that the paintings
were also valuable and collectible commodities and, as such,
became 'Vanitas' objects themselves.
Harmen
Steenwyck Notes

Harmen
Steenwyck - Still Life (oil on canvas)
Private
Collection